Our Board

Board Of Directors

Daniel Dotse

BOARD CHAIR

Co-Founder and CEO, Lead for Ghana

Dr. Fatma Odaymat

BOARD MEMBER

Director, Al-Rayan International School, Ghana

Lee Siang

BOARD MEMBER

CEO, Dyslexia Association of Singapore, Singapore

Tonisha Tagoe

BOARD MEMBER

CEO, Apples and Pears Holdings, Ghana, Dubai, UK

Aaron Dante Philip

BOARD MEMBER

Global Sustainability Consultant, Green Earth Sustainable Solutions, USA

Jennifer Topple

BOARD MEMBER

Director of Language, Literacy Assistive Technology, The Howard School, USA

Yemi Babington-Ashaye

BOARD MEMBER

President, United People Global

As we continue to grow and develop, we will strive to implement new strategies and initiatives to meet our goals. Our initiatives be supplemented by other strategies and activities, such as providing resources to individuals and organizations, offering mentoring and support services, and engaging in collaborative research on more global level. Through our comprehensive approach, we are committed to reducing the stigma associated with dyslexia and ensuring that people with dyslexia are given the same opportunities as everyone else.

Scroll to Top

WHO ARE YOU TO THE CHILD ?

The Adult Reading History Questionnaire (ARHQ) is a screening tool designed to measure risk of reading disability (i.e. dyslexia) in adults (Lefly & Pennington, 2000), but it can also help measure risk in children, especially before school age. Reading disability is highly heritable: about 30-60% percent of children born to a dyslexic parent will develop dyslexia. Thus, one way to estimate risk of reading disability in preschool children is to evaluate parents’ own reading history. The following questionnaire was developed using parents’ reports of their own reading history as well as actual testing of their children’s reading skills. If a parent scores high on the ARHQ, their child has a higher risk of developing a reading disability. It is important to note that the ARHQ is only a screener and does not constitute a formal evaluation or diagnosis of either the parent or the child. If you have concerns about your child’s reading progress, we recommend that you contact your child’s school, a licensed child psychologist, or your child’s primary care physician about pursuing a more thorough evaluation to investigate the nature of these concerns.

The Colorado Learning Disabilities Questionnaire – Reading Subscale (CLDQ-R) is a screening tool designed to measure risk of reading disability (i.e. dyslexia) in school-age children (Willcutt, Boada, Riddle, Chhabildas, DeFries & Pennington, 2011). Normative scores for this questionnaire were developed based on parent-reports of their 6-18 year-old children, as well as actual reading testing of these children. Willcutt, et al. (2011) found that the CLDQ-R is reliable and valid. It is important to note that the CLDQ-R is only a screener and does not constitute a formal evaluation or diagnosis. If you have concerns about your child’s reading progress, we recommend that you contact your child’s school, a licensed child psychologist, or your child’s primary care physician about pursuing a more thorough evaluation to investigate the nature of these concerns. For more information about the symptoms, causes and treatment of reading disability (dyslexia), please visit the International Dyslexia Association

WHAT'S YOUR GENDER?

The Adult Reading History Questionnaire (ARHQ) is a self-report screening tool designed to measure risk of reading disability (i.e. dyslexia) in adults (Lefly & Pennington, 2000). The ARHQ asks adults about their own reading history and current reading habits in order to estimate the risk that they may have a reading disability. Normative scores are based on actual testing, and Lefly & Pennington (2000) found that the ARHQ is reliable and valid. It is important to note that the ARHQ is only a screener and does not constitute a formal evaluation or diagnosis. If you have concerns about your reading skills, we recommend that you contact a licensed psychologist or your primary care physician about pursuing a more thorough evaluation to investigate the nature of these concerns.