From Awareness to Access: What Inclusion Actually Looks Like Day to Day

/ Dyslexia Awareness. / By Nat Hawley, MSc (Applied Neuroscience) and Divergent Thinking

For Neurodiversity Celebration Week, Africa Dyslexia Organisation has kindly handed today’s blog over to Divergent Thinking. I’m really grateful for that. It also feels like a natural continuation of the work we’ve already done together through the ADO community webinar and the Advocates Fellowship network.

One thing I respect about ADO is that you don’t do “awareness for awareness’ sake”. You talk about what families and teachers are actually dealing with and you keep pushing for practical change, even when systems move slowly.

So this post is simple. If we want inclusion to mean anything, it has to show up in everyday routines: instructions, teaching, assessment, feedback, and the way we talk about children.

The problem isn’t effort. It’s friction.

A lot of dyslexic learners are trying hard. The issue is that many environments reward a narrow set of skills: speed, spelling, handwriting, copying accurately, and remembering long instructions.

So the child who is bright, curious, and full of ideas becomes the child who is labelled:

“lazy”
“careless”
“not serious”
“always distracted”

That story is incredibly common. And it does damage.
Because after enough times being told you’re “not trying”, you start to believe it.

Support shouldn’t be something a child has to “earn”

In many places, formal assessment is hard to access. It can be expensive, slow, or simply not available. That means a lot of families are stuck waiting for proof, while their child’s confidence takes the hit.

A more helpful starting point is needs-led support.
Not: “Prove it first.”

But: “What’s getting in the way, and what could we change to make this easier?”

That shift alone changes the whole tone of a classroom.

Four things that help quickly (without a big budget)

1) Make instructions clearer than feels necessary

A surprising amount of struggle is just task confusion.

Try:

  • say the task in one sentence
  • break it into steps
  • show an example of what “good” looks like
  • check understanding quietly (not by putting a child on the spot)

Clarity reduces shame. It also reduces behaviour issues that are actually just overwhelm.

2) Reduce the amount of copying and “board work”

Copying from the board is a perfect storm for dyslexic learners: reading, tracking, spelling, handwriting, and memory at the same time.

Small alternatives:

  • give a printed version when possible
  • let a learner photograph the board
  • pair learners so one can focus on listening while the other copies
  • reduce “copy this paragraph” tasks unless the goal is specifically handwriting practice

3) Stop treating writing as the only proof of learning

If a child can explain an idea out loud but struggles to write it neatly, that isn’t a lack of understanding. It’s a format barrier.

Options that still keep standards high:

  • oral answers
  • short bullet points
  • mind maps
  • sentence starters
  • structured templates (“First… Then… Because…”)

The goal is to assess the thinking, not the spelling.

4) Protect confidence like it’s part of learning

Confidence isn’t a “nice extra”. It’s part of capacity.

A few things that matter more than people realise:

  • avoid public reading aloud without choice
  • don’t correct spelling on everything (pick the priority)
  • praise effort + strategy, not just neatness
  • help learners see strengths (problem-solving, creativity, big-picture thinking)

When a learner stops feeling constantly “wrong”, they try more.

Why this links to sustainability (and why ADO’s direction matters)

Here’s the honest part: many people agree with inclusion in principle. Fewer are willing to fund it properly.

That’s why sustainable models matter. When organisations can generate revenue through high-quality training and consultancy, they’re less dependent on unpredictable grants and can subsidise support where it’s most needed.

This is exactly what we’ve spoken about with ADO: scaling teacher capacity, strengthening school support, and developing services that keep impact work going long-term.

Closing thought

Awareness is a starting point. Access is the goal.

If Neurodiversity Celebration Week is going to mean something beyond a calendar moment, it should leave behind practical changes that reduce barriers for dyslexic learners, protect confidence, and help families and teachers feel less alone in this.

Author

Nat Hawley is a UK-based neuroinclusion consultant with an MSc in Applied Neuroscience and the founder of Divergent Thinking. He supports organisations to implement practical neuroinclusion through training, audits and workplace needs support, and collaborates with mission-driven partners to widen access to education and employment for neurodivergent people.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top

WHO ARE YOU TO THE CHILD ?

The Adult Reading History Questionnaire (ARHQ) is a screening tool designed to measure risk of reading disability (i.e. dyslexia) in adults (Lefly & Pennington, 2000), but it can also help measure risk in children, especially before school age. Reading disability is highly heritable: about 30-60% percent of children born to a dyslexic parent will develop dyslexia. Thus, one way to estimate risk of reading disability in preschool children is to evaluate parents’ own reading history. The following questionnaire was developed using parents’ reports of their own reading history as well as actual testing of their children’s reading skills. If a parent scores high on the ARHQ, their child has a higher risk of developing a reading disability. It is important to note that the ARHQ is only a screener and does not constitute a formal evaluation or diagnosis of either the parent or the child. If you have concerns about your child’s reading progress, we recommend that you contact your child’s school, a licensed child psychologist, or your child’s primary care physician about pursuing a more thorough evaluation to investigate the nature of these concerns.

The Colorado Learning Disabilities Questionnaire – Reading Subscale (CLDQ-R) is a screening tool designed to measure risk of reading disability (i.e. dyslexia) in school-age children (Willcutt, Boada, Riddle, Chhabildas, DeFries & Pennington, 2011). Normative scores for this questionnaire were developed based on parent-reports of their 6-18 year-old children, as well as actual reading testing of these children. Willcutt, et al. (2011) found that the CLDQ-R is reliable and valid. It is important to note that the CLDQ-R is only a screener and does not constitute a formal evaluation or diagnosis. If you have concerns about your child’s reading progress, we recommend that you contact your child’s school, a licensed child psychologist, or your child’s primary care physician about pursuing a more thorough evaluation to investigate the nature of these concerns. For more information about the symptoms, causes and treatment of reading disability (dyslexia), please visit the International Dyslexia Association

WHAT'S YOUR GENDER?

The Adult Reading History Questionnaire (ARHQ) is a self-report screening tool designed to measure risk of reading disability (i.e. dyslexia) in adults (Lefly & Pennington, 2000). The ARHQ asks adults about their own reading history and current reading habits in order to estimate the risk that they may have a reading disability. Normative scores are based on actual testing, and Lefly & Pennington (2000) found that the ARHQ is reliable and valid. It is important to note that the ARHQ is only a screener and does not constitute a formal evaluation or diagnosis. If you have concerns about your reading skills, we recommend that you contact a licensed psychologist or your primary care physician about pursuing a more thorough evaluation to investigate the nature of these concerns.